Your trusted source

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has held the final hearing of the case of Perinçek v. Switzerland (application no. 27510/08). ECHR in Strasbourg has ruled that Switzerland violated DoğuPerinçek's right to freedom of speech. The decision of the 17-judge ECHR Grand Chamber is final. The applicant, DoğuPerinçek, is a Turkish national who was born in 1942 and lives in Ankara

(Turkey). He is a doctor of laws and chairman of the Turkish Workers’ Party.

In 2005 MrPerinçek participated in three public events in Switzerland, in the course of which he expressed the view that the mass deportations and massacres suffered by the Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire from 1915 onwards had not amounted to genocide.The Switzerland-Armenia Association lodged a criminal complaint against MrPerinçek on account of the statement made at the first event. The investigation was later expanded to cover the two other statements as well. On 9 March 2007 the Lausanne District Police Court found him guilty of the offence under Article 261 bis§ 4 of the Swiss Criminal Code, holding in particular that his motives appeared to be racist and nationalistic and that his statements did not contribute to the historical
debate. The court ordered him to pay 90 day-fines of 100 Swiss francs each, suspended for two years, a fine of 3,000 Swiss francs, which could be replaced by 30 days imprisonment, and 1,000 Swiss francs in compensation to the Switzerland-Armenia Association for non-pecuniary damage.

MrPerinçek appealed against the judgment, seeking to have it set aside and additional investigative measures taken to establish the state of research and the positions of historians on the events of 1915 and the following years. The Criminal Cassation Division of the Vaud Cantonal Court dismissed the appeal on 13 June 2007. The Federal Court dismissed a further appeal by MrPerinçek in a judgment of 12 December 2007. MrPerinçek complains that his criminal conviction and punishment for having publicly stated that there had not been an Armenian genocide was in breach of his right to freedom of expression under
Article 10. He also complains, relying on Article 7 (no punishment without law), that the wording of Article 261 bis§ 4 of the Swiss Criminal Code is too vague.

The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 10 June 2008. In a been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention. The Swiss Government requested that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 (referral to the Grand Chamber), and on 2 June 2014 the panel of the Grand Chamber accepted that request. A Grand Chamber hearing was held on 28 January 2015.

Prior to the hearing, on January 27, Armenian Government Representative to ECHR GevogKostanyan said at a press conference what expectations the Armenian side had regarding the case hearing. He said that any formulation that in some way or other makes the Armenian Genocide disputable is unacceptable, on principle, to Armenia.

Geoffrey Robertson told Panorama.am at that time that Armenia’s main goal was to refute the decision’s claims denying that the 1915 massacres and deportations amounted to genocide.

France and Turkey are also involved as third parties in the case of Perincek v. Switzerland.