Scientists not yet sure about link between Zika virus and birth abnormalities
One of the world’s leading virologists has warned against public hysteria surrounding the Zika virus, saying global health authorities need to focus more broadly on prevention of infectious diseases rather than finding a cure for specific outbreaks, The Guardian writes.
Most of the current alarm focuses on a suspected link between Zika and a foetal deformity known as microcephaly, which leads to babies being born with abnormally small heads. In Brazil, where there has been a rapid increase in reported cases of both Zika and microcephaly over the past six months, the government is convinced there is a causal association. The World Health Organisation has declared a global health emergency, according to the Guardian.
However, many scientists, including Leslie Lobel, an Israeli physician who has worked with the US military and the Uganda Virus Research Institute to try to find a vaccine for Ebola, say the evidence is not yet conclusive. “It’s not clear that what’s going on in Brazil is linked to the Zika virus. There’s no definitive proof that Zika is causing microcephaly. I believe the hysteria is way ahead of the research or the facts about the pathology surrounding this virus,” he told the Guardian.
According to the newspaper, doubts focus on the uneven spread of the disease and birth abnormalities. Almost all the linked cases are found in the north-east region of Brazil. Elsewhere, the Zika outbreak does not appear to have had the same impact. In neighbouring Colombia, which has more than 31,000 Zika cases, including at least 5,000 pregnant women, there has not been the same sharp rise in foetal deformities. There, the virus is more closely associated with Guillain–Barré syndrome, an immune system failure that can cause paralysis and death.
Lobel has studied Zika in Uganda, where it was first discovered in 1947 and had always been believed to be relatively benign. He says the apparently different impacts from place to place could be caused by the “drift” of the virus. “Their genetics mutate all the time. That’s how viruses tend to survive. They constantly change to adapt to the environment.”
Based in Ben-Gurion University, where he is chair of the virology department, Lobel will visit Brazil in a few months to collaborate with scientists in São Paulo on a study of Zika and its impact on the immune system. This could eventually help in the development of a vaccine, but he emphasises it is more important first to understand whether the disease is really causing microcephaly, or whether other factors might be jointly or solely responsible.
On Wednesday, the WHO outlined its Zika action plan, saying that $56m (£39m) was needed to combat the virus from now until June, including fast-tracking vaccines and diagnostics, the Guardian reports. The current panic over Zika, Lobel said, was a sign of how ill-prepared the world was for such epidemics, which meant it was always fighting the last outbreak rather than the next one. He believes the WHO declared an emergency with Zika this time because governments were nervous after failing to deal adequately with Ebola. Similarly, he said the US has suddenly announced almost $2bn in Zika research funding because it is worried the disease will head up through Mexico once the northern hemisphere summer arrives.
He believes the money could be spent more effectively to deal with future, more severe challenges. “There’s a lot that might be done that is not being done in a corrective way to control all disease, not just Zika. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There are going to be a lot more.”
Compared to Ebola or dengue, he said Zika was not much to worry about other than for pregnant women, in which case it was prudent to take precautions until more is known about the risks and the possible link with microcephaly. “I don’t want to downplay this,” he told the Guardian. “The association is very compelling, very clear. But we need a lot more work and we need to do it fast.”
In the meantime, Lobel calls for a measured response. “Hysteria is always unwanted. We need to educate. We need to make a calm response. We don’t want hysteria because that leads to massive social unrest, which can cause more damage than the virus itself.”